SOC 3 Audit
SOC 3 reports provide assurance regarding an organization's internal controls and make the report public. Unlike SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports, SOC 3 is intended for general use and distribution. These audits focus on all key aspects: security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, and processing integrity.
SOC 3 reports are concise, describing key elements of the control system, but without disclosing confidential internal information. In the case of a positive opinion, they offer the possibility of using the AICPA SOC3 logo, which organizations can place on their websites or marketing materials.
Key components of a SOC 3 audit include:
-
Management assertion: A statement from the service organization affirming their system meets Trust Services Criteria.
-
Independent auditor's opinion: The auditor's assessment of the organization's controls.
-
System description: A brief description of the provided service and the internal control system.
SOC 3 audits do not delve into the details of specific controls. Instead, they present an opinion on whether the organization's controls meet the trust services criteria.
These audits are particularly valuable for cloud service providers, data centers, and SaaS companies. They offer a way to demonstrate reliability without revealing sensitive information.
Who needs a SOC 3 audit?
SOC 3 audits are valuable for a wide range of industries and organizations. Companies that handle sensitive customer data or provide critical services often benefit the most from these assessments. Let's explore some key sectors and examples:
Financial Services
Banks, credit unions, and fintech startups rely on SOC 3 reports to demonstrate their commitment to data security.
Healthcare
Medical institutions and health tech companies use SOC 3 to comply with HIPAA regulations.
Cloud Service Providers
Giants like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure regularly conduct SOC 3 audits. These reports help them attract and retain enterprise clients who demand robust security measures.
E-commerce Platforms
Online retailers benefit from SOC 3 to build trust with customers. Shopify's SOC 3 compliance has been crucial in its growth as a secure e-commerce solution.
SOC 3 vs. SOC 2 - key distinctions
While both SOC 3 and SOC 2 reports fall under the Service Organization Control framework, they serve distinct purposes and audiences. Understanding these differences is crucial for organizations seeking to demonstrate their commitment to security and compliance.
Scope and depth of reporting vary significantly between the two. SOC 2 reports offer a comprehensive, in-depth examination of an organization's internal controls. They delve into the nitty-gritty details of security practices, providing a granular view of how a company safeguards data. Conversely, SOC 3 reports present a high-level overview, offering a condensed summary of the organization's security posture without divulging sensitive information.
The intended audience and distribution methods for these reports differ markedly. SOC 2 reports are typically restricted to management, regulators, and business partners who require detailed insights into a company's security measures. Their confidential nature limits their circulation. On the other hand, SOC 3 reports are designed for public consumption. Companies can freely distribute them to potential customers, stakeholders, and the general public, making them ideal for marketing and building trust.​
Organizations must carefully consider their objectives when choosing between SOC 3 and SOC 2 reports. For those seeking to provide detailed assurance to specific stakeholders, SOC 2 is the go-to option. However, for companies looking to broadly communicate their commitment to security and compliance, SOC 3 offers a more accessible and widely distributable solution.
Stay in touch
ITGRC ADVISORY LTD.
590 Kingston Road, London,
United Kingdom, SW20 8DN
​company number: 12435469
​